RESUMO
Background: Facial palsy patients face significant challenges. Gracilis free flap transfer is a key procedure in facial reanimation. Objective: This study aims to analyze oral commissure excursion improvement after gracilis free flap transfer and the differences regarding donor nerve: cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG), hypoglossal or spinal accessory nerves, motor nerve to masseteric (MNTM), and most recently, double anastomosis using both the MNTM and CFNG. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of studies reporting oral commissure excursion improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Eighteen studies, 453 patients, and 488 free gracilis flaps were included. The mean change in perioperative oral commissure excursion was 7.0 mm, for CFNG 7.2 mm, for MNTM 7.7, and for double anastomoses 5.5 mm. Conclusions: There is a significant improvement in oral commissure excursion after gracilis muscle-free flap. Unfortunately, we could not make definitive conclusions regarding the optimal choice of donor nerve.
Assuntos
Paralisia Facial , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Músculo Grácil , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Músculo Grácil/transplante , Paralisia Facial/cirurgia , Sorriso/fisiologia , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/transplanteRESUMO
PURPOSE: Characterize head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in solid transplant recipients and compare outcomes with non-transplanted population. METHODS: We carried a retrospective cohort analysis in a tertiary care center in Madrid, Spain. The study reviews 26 cases of non-cutaneous HNSCC diagnosed in solid organ transplant recipients between 2000 and 2017. We select a cohort of 130 (1:5) non-transplanted patients among all non-transplanted patients diagnosed during the same period for comparison purposes, through hierarchical clustering analysis. Univariate, overall and specific survival analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate our objectives. RESULTS: The overall risk of non-cutaneous HNSCC in solid transplant recipients was 7.2 cases per 1000. Alcohol abuse (p = 0.021) and upfront surgery (p = 0.019) were more likely to occur in transplanted patients. Age > 60 was an independent predictor of worse outcomes both for overall (HR = 2.4, p < 0.001) and specific (HR = 2.1, p = 0.012) survival. Transplant significantly worse overall survival (HR = 2.1, p = 0.012) but no statistical significant differences were observed on specific survival (p = 0.392). CONCLUSIONS: Solid organ transplant recipients have a higher risk of suffering non-cutaneous HNSCC. The higher mortality rate of these patients does not appear to be directly related to suffering from head and neck cancer, although it seems to contribute to developing other fatal complications in these fragile patients.